Java/Sort List.java

M
1528213775
tags: Linked List, Sort, Merge Sort, Divide and Conquer

#### Merge sort
- 1. find middle. 快慢指针
- 2. Sort: 切开两半，先sort前半, 如果先sort了mid.next~end, sort后，中间点mid.next == null，再sort前半段
- 3. Merge:  假设given list A, B 已经是sorted, 然后按照大小，混合。
- 要recursively call sortList() on partial list.

#### Quick sort
- 想做可以看讲义：http://www.jiuzhang.com/solutions/sort-list/
- 但是quick sort不建议用在list上面。
- 排列list, merge sort可能更可行和合理。原因分析在下面， 以及： http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/why-quick-sort-preferred-for-arrays-and-merge-sort-for-linked-lists/

```
/*

Sort a linked list in O(n log n) time using constant space complexity.

Example 1:

Input: 4->2->1->3
Output: 1->2->3->4
Example 2:

Input: -1->5->3->4->0
Output: -1->0->3->4->5

*/

/**
 * Definition for ListNode.
 * public class ListNode {
 *     int val;
 *     ListNode next;
 *     ListNode(int val) {
 *         this.val = val;
 *         this.next = null;
 *     }
 * }
 */ 

/*
Thinking process:
1.Divide and conquer
2. can use merge sort or quick sort. Used merge sort here.
3. Find middle
4. Sort each side recursively.
5. merge function.
Note: when checking null, node != null should be in front of node.next != null. Because if node is alreay null, node.next gives exception.

*/
public class Solution {
    public ListNode sortList(ListNode head) {  
        if (head == null || head.next == null) {
            return head;
        }
        ListNode mid = findMiddle(head);
        ListNode right = sortList(mid.next);
        mid.next = null;
        ListNode left = sortList(head);
        return merge(left, right);
    }

    public ListNode findMiddle(ListNode head) {
        ListNode slow = head;
        ListNode fast = head.next;
        while (fast != null && fast.next != null) {
            slow = slow.next;
            fast = fast.next.next;
        }
        return slow;
    }
    
    public ListNode merge(ListNode left, ListNode right) {
        ListNode dummy = new ListNode(0);
        ListNode head = dummy;
        while (left != null && right != null) {
            if (left.val < right.val) {
                head.next = left;
                left = left.next;
            } else {
                head.next = right;
                right = right.next;
            }
            head = head.next;
        }
        if (left != null) {
            head.next = left;
        } else if (right != null){
            head.next = right;
        }
        return dummy.next;
    }
}


/*
    12.09.2015:  http://www.jiuzhang.com/solutions/sort-list/
    Quick sort. 

    Didn't do this myself yet. This is because Quick sort in general is not so good for list.
    Quick sort requires a lot random access to elements, which turns into worst case O(n) time to access a element 
    in list. So it can be worse to o(n^2).
    So here Merge sort is prefered.

    Quick sort is prefered for array sort, partition.

    Merge sort is prefered for list sort
*/

```