[swiftc] Add test case for crash triggered in swift::TypeChecker::applyUnboundGenericArguments(…) #1625
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci Please test |
…lyUnboundGenericArguments(swift::UnboundGenericType*, swift::SourceLoc, swift::DeclContext*, llvm::MutableArrayRef<swift::TypeLoc>, bool, swift::GenericTypeResolver*) Stack trace: ``` swift: /path/to/swift/include/swift/AST/Decl.h:2439: swift::Type swift::TypeAliasDecl::getUnderlyingType() const: Assertion `!UnderlyingTy.getType().isNull() && "getting invalid underlying type"' failed. 8 swift 0x0000000000ea84f9 swift::TypeChecker::applyUnboundGenericArguments(swift::UnboundGenericType*, swift::SourceLoc, swift::DeclContext*, llvm::MutableArrayRef<swift::TypeLoc>, bool, swift::GenericTypeResolver*) + 1321 9 swift 0x0000000000ea7e7f swift::TypeChecker::applyGenericArguments(swift::Type, swift::SourceLoc, swift::DeclContext*, swift::GenericIdentTypeRepr*, bool, swift::GenericTypeResolver*) + 431 13 swift 0x0000000000ea864e swift::TypeChecker::resolveIdentifierType(swift::DeclContext*, swift::IdentTypeRepr*, swift::OptionSet<swift::TypeResolutionFlags, unsigned int>, bool, swift::GenericTypeResolver*, llvm::function_ref<bool (swift::TypeCheckRequest)>*) + 158 15 swift 0x0000000000ea9564 swift::TypeChecker::resolveType(swift::TypeRepr*, swift::DeclContext*, swift::OptionSet<swift::TypeResolutionFlags, unsigned int>, swift::GenericTypeResolver*, llvm::function_ref<bool (swift::TypeCheckRequest)>*) + 164 16 swift 0x0000000000ea854a swift::TypeChecker::validateType(swift::TypeLoc&, swift::DeclContext*, swift::OptionSet<swift::TypeResolutionFlags, unsigned int>, swift::GenericTypeResolver*, llvm::function_ref<bool (swift::TypeCheckRequest)>*) + 42 17 swift 0x0000000000f6086f swift::IterativeTypeChecker::processResolveInheritedClauseEntry(std::pair<llvm::PointerUnion<swift::TypeDecl*, swift::ExtensionDecl*>, unsigned int>, llvm::function_ref<bool (swift::TypeCheckRequest)>) + 159 18 swift 0x0000000000f3f22d swift::IterativeTypeChecker::satisfy(swift::TypeCheckRequest) + 493 19 swift 0x0000000000f3f3b9 swift::IterativeTypeChecker::satisfy(swift::TypeCheckRequest) + 889 20 swift 0x0000000000e3af40 swift::TypeChecker::resolveRawType(swift::EnumDecl*) + 64 21 swift 0x00000000010848bf swift::NominalTypeDecl::prepareConformanceTable() const + 351 22 swift 0x0000000001084b7f swift::NominalTypeDecl::getImplicitProtocols(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<swift::ProtocolDecl*>&) + 15 23 swift 0x0000000000e3b52c swift::TypeChecker::checkInheritanceClause(swift::Decl*, swift::GenericTypeResolver*) + 1180 24 swift 0x0000000000e3e47f swift::TypeChecker::validateDecl(swift::ValueDecl*, bool) + 527 29 swift 0x0000000000e43ed6 swift::TypeChecker::typeCheckDecl(swift::Decl*, bool) + 150 33 swift 0x0000000000ea3736 swift::TypeChecker::typeCheckTopLevelCodeDecl(swift::TopLevelCodeDecl*) + 134 34 swift 0x0000000000e671bd swift::performTypeChecking(swift::SourceFile&, swift::TopLevelContext&, swift::OptionSet<swift::TypeCheckingFlags, unsigned int>, unsigned int) + 1149 35 swift 0x0000000000cb9d8f swift::CompilerInstance::performSema() + 3087 37 swift 0x000000000078ab9b frontend_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) + 2523 38 swift 0x0000000000785645 main + 2837 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /path/to/swift/bin/swift -frontend -c -primary-file validation-test/compiler_crashers/28262-swift-typechecker-applyunboundgenericarguments.swift -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -disable-objc-interop -module-name main -o /tmp/28262-swift-typechecker-applyunboundgenericarguments-a3dcd2.o 1. While type-checking 'S' at validation-test/compiler_crashers/28262-swift-typechecker-applyunboundgenericarguments.swift:8:4 2. While resolving type d<T> at [validation-test/compiler_crashers/28262-swift-typechecker-applyunboundgenericarguments.swift:8:20 - line:8:23] RangeText="d<T>" <unknown>:0: error: unable to execute command: Aborted <unknown>:0: error: compile command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) ```
|
@tkremenek Pull request updated :-) |
lattner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2016
…hecker-applyunboundgenericarguments [swiftc] Add test case for crash triggered in swift::TypeChecker::applyUnboundGenericArguments(…)
|
LGTM, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's in this pull request?
Crash case with stack trace:
Resolved bug number: (SR-)
Before merging this pull request to apple/swift repository:
Triggering Swift CI
The swift-ci is triggered by writing a comment on this PR addressed to the GitHub user @swift-ci. Different tests will run depending on the specific comment that you use. The currently available comments are:
Smoke Testing
Validation Testing
Note: Only members of the Apple organization can trigger swift-ci.